ON THE GENESIS OF SERIAL FROM FREE ATONALITY

Natal'ya V. Devuckaya

doi:10.31804/2782-4926-2026-5-2-61-68

Submit manuscript

Siberian Art History Journal

Journals / Siberian Art History Journal / Volume 5 Issue 2 / ON THE GENESIS OF SERIAL FROM FREE ATONALITY

UDC 781

ON THE GENESIS OF SERIAL FROM FREE ATONALITY

Published in Siberian Art History Journal · Volume 5, Issue 2 · Pages 61–68 · Rubric: musical art

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-4926-2026-5-2-61-68

Received: 06.04.2026 Accepted: 25.06.2026 Published: 30.06.2026

Authors

Natal'ya V. Devuckaya

Voronezh State Institute of Arts docent · kafedra teorii muzyki · Russian Federation · Voronezh

ABSTRACT

Serialism is one of the most conceptually significant and technically productive ideas to emerge in twentieth-century musical thought, and it played a decisive role in shaping the breakthroughs of the postwar avant-garde. Its interpretation as a phenomenon with considerable creative potential remains highly relevant today. The present article proceeds from the premise that the crystallization of serial thinking was neither methodologically unified nor stylistically homogeneous. This is demonstrated through a comparison of Bagatelle No. 1, Op. 9 by Anton Webern and Piano Piece No. 3, Op. 23 by Arnold Schoenberg, whose differing compositional approaches underscore the individuality of each work. Both pieces are generally situated within the domain of free atonality as cultivated by the Second Viennese School in the first quarter of the twentieth century. Although Schoenberg’s piano piece (1923) postdates Webern’s Bagatelle by roughly a decade, the earlier work proves no less rigorous in its organization of pitch. Indeed, in certain respects, Webern’s Op. 9 may be regarded as even more forward-looking than Schoenberg’s pre-dodecaphonic composition. On the basis of a structural analysis of Bagatelle No. 1, the author argues for the presence of an incipient form of serial organization—what might be described as a “serial genesis”—within Webern’s work.

KEYWORDS

atonality, seriality, dodecaphony, A. Webern, A. Schoenberg, Bagatelle, microseries

1. Vebern A. (1975). Lectures about music. Letters. M.: Music, 143.

2. Vlasova N. (2010). The work of Arnold Schoenberg. Moscow: LKI Publishing House, 528.

3. Dʹyachkova L. (1994). Harmony in music of the XX. M.: Music,144.

4. Kogoutek Ts. (1976) The technique of composition in music of the XX century. M.: Music, 367.

5. Kudryashov Yu. (2001). Isomorphic modes of Webern // Mode systems of European music of the twentieth century. M.: Composer, 142-164.

6. Kurbatskaya S. (1996). Serial music: questions of history, theory, aesthetics 1996.Serijnaya muzyka: voprosy istorii, teorii, estetiki. M.: «Sfera», 389.

7. Kholopov Yu. (1974). Essays on modern harmony. Research. Moscow: Muzyka, 287.

8. Kholopova V., Kholopov Yu. (1999). Webern's Music: A Study. M.: Composer, 368.

9. Tsenova V. (2005). Theory of modern composition: A Textbook. Moscow: Muzyka, 624.

10. Boulez P. (1958) The Threshold. Die Reihe, 2/ii, 40–41.

11. Perle G. (1991). Serial Composition and Atonality: an introduction to the music of Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern, 6th ed. University of California Press, 164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520352971

12. Pousseur H. (1958) Webern’s Organic Chromaticism. Die Reihe, 2/ii, 51–60.

13. Schoenberg A. (1958). Foreword to Webern’s Six Bagatellés for string quartet op.6. Die Reihe, 2/ii, 8.

14. Schoenberg A. (1985) Style and idea: selected writings of Arnold Schoenberg. University of California Press, 559.

JATS XML

Doctor of Cultural Studies, Docent

Julia Zamaraeva

rybka08@bk.ru

Candidate of Philosophical Sciences

Anastasia Kistova

Candidate of Cultural Studies, Docent

Maria Kolesnik

masha_kolesnik@mail.ru

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor

Natal'ya P. Kopceva