Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019)

Anastasia Kupriyanova

doi:10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42

UDC

CSCSTI

18.00

Russian Classification of Professions by Education

50.00.00

Russian Trade and Bibliographic Classification

Russian Library and Bibliographic Classification

BISAC

ART

VAK Russia

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DECOLONIAL AND PARTICIPATORY ESTHESIS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CIRCLE "PLAYING WITH PHOTOGRAPHY" (YAKUTIA, 2019) Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019)

АА Аа

Published in Asia, America and Africa history and modernity · Pages 29–42 · Rubric: Cultural studies

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42

Received: 15.02.2024 Accepted: 01.03.2024 Published: 13.03.2024

Authors

Anastasia Kupriyanova

ABSTRACT

The mode of feeling in modern culture is associated with the interexistence of several competing aesthetic systems, which simultaneously complement each other and exist in a specific antagonism. A striking example of such interaction can be considered decolonial and participatory aesthesis. In addition to the differences in the settings of these theories: the construction of a universal model or a number of local constructs of the perception of art, there is a visible commonality between the classical participatory aesthesis and the decolonial one. As part of the analysis of these phenomena, two art projects are compared, which are based on the principle of participation - the “Bilmair Spinoza Festival” and the photo circle “Playing with Photography”. The study reveals a number of contradictions that the projects under consideration resolve in different ways. The main problems raised during the implementation of practices include the relationship between the work and the viewer, the artist and the viewer, the viewer as an element of the work and a participant in its creation. Within the framework of a decolonial artistic project, the complexity of such relationships is removed not through formal visibility, but through the process of forming a borderline state during interaction with other subjects.

KEYWORDS

participatory art, decoloniality, esthesis, photographic circle, aesthetic theory

1. Fúnez-Flores J. I. Decolonial and ontological challenges in social and anthropological theory / J. I. Funez-Flores //Theory, Culture & Society. - 2022. - V. 39. - №. 6. - Pp. 21-41.

2. Mendoza B. Decolonial theories in comparison / B. Mendoza //Journal of World Philosophies. - 2020. - V. 5. - №. 1. - Pp. 43-60.

3. Pillay S. The problem of colonialism: assimilation, difference, and decolonial theory in Africa / S. Pillay // Critical times. - 2021. - V. 4. - №. 3. - Pp. 389-416.

4. The Bijlmer Spinoza-festival [Elektronnyj resurs]: https://www.thomashirschhorn.com/the-bijlmer-spinoza-festival/

5. Bishop K. Iskusstvennyj ad: participatornoe iskusstvo i politika zritel'stva / [Per. s angl.: Vanya Solovej]. - Moskva: V-A-C Press, 2018. - 522, [3] s.: il., portr., faks., tabl. - ISBN 978-5-9909519-0-7.

6. Breeva, T. N. Nacional'noe vs global'noe v sovremennoj russkoj proze / T. N. Breeva // Filologiya i kul'tura. - 2022. - № 3(69). - S. 64-69. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26907/2074-0239-2022-69-3-64-69. - EDN REBJFY.

7. Burrio N. Relyacionnaya estetika. Postprodukciya. - M.: Ad Marginem Press, 2016. - 216 s. - ISBN: 978-5-91103-290-6

8. Lukina, P. The Making of Modern Art: "periferijnyj" diskurs i vystavochnye strategii / P. Lukina // Iskusstvoznanie. - 2020. - № 4. - S. 144-169. - EDN ABUPMQ.

9. Martirosyan, G. E. Afrofuturizm v kanadskoj literature XXI veka (na primere sbornika rasskazov K. Kellou "Dominoes at the Crossroads") / G. E. Martirosyan // Vestnik Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. - 2022. - № 2. - S. 11-20. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.46726/H.2022.2.2. - EDN GCZKIO.

10. Neklessa, A. I. Postkolonial'nost' v global'nom i regional'nom izmereniyah / A. I. Neklessa // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2021. - T. 21, № 1. - S. 9-19. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2021-21-1-9-19. - EDN ZYRREB.

11. Semenova Dzh. Zametki o neulovimoj forme molchaniya / Dzh. Semenova // Dekolonial'nost': nastoyashchee i budushchee. Sbornik statej. - M.: Gorizontal', 2022. - 154 s.

12. Slashchinina, A. P. Cennostnyj plyuralizm i obrazovanie v kontekste dekolonial'nosti / A. P. Slashchinina // CHELOVEK. Kul'tura. Obshchestvo: materialy XI Mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, Penza, 17-18 maya 2021 goda. - Penza: Penzenskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2021. - S. 170-173. - EDN ALIHBO.

13. Suyarkulova, M. Rec. na: Tlostanova M. Dekolonial'nost' bytiya, znaniya i oshchushcheniya. Sbornik statej / M. Suyarkulova // Antropologii. - 2022. - № 1. - S. 151-154. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.33876/2782-3423/2022-1/151-154. - EDN FJFLRJ.

14. Tishkov V. A. Etnologiya i politika / V. A. Tishkov. - M.: Nauka, 2001. - 239 s. - ISBN 5-02-008799-8.

15. Tlostanova M. V. Dekolonial'nost' bytiya, znaniya i oshchushcheniya / M. V. Tlostanova. - Almaty: Centr Sovremennoj Kul'tury «Celinnyj», 2020. - 192 s.

16. Tlostanova M. V. Ot filosofii mul'tikul'turalizma k filosofii transkul'turacii / M. V. Tlostanova. M.: «Severnyj krest», 2008. - 256 s.

17. Tlostanova, M. Postkolonial'nyj udel i dekolonial'nyj vybor: postsocialisticheskaya mediaciya / M. Tlostanova // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. - 2020. - № 1(161). - S. 66-84. - EDN BZRRAR.

18. Fanon F. CHernaya kozha, belye maski / Franc Fanon; perevod s francuzskogo D. Timofeeva. - Moskva: Garazh, 2022. - 223 s. ISBN 978-5-6045383-5-7.

19. Fituni, L. L. Politicheskaya teoriya dekolonizacii: imperativy sovremennogo prochteniya / L. L. Fituni, I. O. Abramova // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. - 2020. - № 6. - S. 26-40. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2020.06.03. - EDN KLPCXO.

JATS XML

Chief Editor

Natal'ya P. Kopceva

1316

downloads

GOST

Kupriyanova A. A. Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019) // Asia, America and Africa history and modernity. 2024. no. 1. pp. 29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42. (Date of access 07.09.2026).

MLA

Anastasia Kupriyanova. "Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019)." Asia, America and Africa history and modernity 3.1 (2024): 29-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42.

APA

Kupriyanova A. A. (2024). Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019). Asia, America and Africa history and modernity, 3(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42

Chicago

Anastasia Kupriyanova. "Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019)." Asia, America and Africa history and modernity 3, no. 1 (2024): 29-42. https://doi.org/10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = Kupriyanova A. A. | title = Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019) | journal = Asia, America and Africa history and modernity | year = 2024 | volume = 3 | issue = 1 | pages = 29-42 | doi = 10.31804/2782-540X-2024-3-1-29-42 }}

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE DECOLONIAL AND PARTICIPATORY ESTHESIS ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE PHOTOGRAPHIC CIRCLE "PLAYING WITH PHOTOGRAPHY" (YAKUTIA, 2019) Differences Between the Decolonial and Participatory Esthesis on the Example of the Photographic Circle "Playing with Photography" (Yakutia, 2019)

Confirmation